top of page
Search

That's it. The position.

  • Writer: AJ
    AJ
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 2 min read

Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Watching someone have a full-body, ALL CAPS moral outrage about AI not being real art . . . while their entire position boils down to . . . you just wrote a prompt.


That’s it. That’s their position.


This ignores intent, iteration, skill, curation, taste, context, lived experience, interpretation and ironically human judgement.

This is just another example of discomfort with a shift in who gets to participate. And history is very clear on how these outrages age.


This isn’t new. 


🙋‍♀️ 1970s


Harold Cohen created AARON, a system that autonomously generated drawings and paintings. No prompts. Rule-based machine creativity, decades ago.


🙋‍♀️ 1990s


Karl Sims used genetic algorithms and artificial life systems to evolve images, virtual creatures and behaviours. Artists setting conditions, not outcomes.


🙋‍♀️ 2000s


Casey Reas helped a generation of artists think algorithmically. Not AI as we frame it today, but absolutely the cultural groundwork.


🙋‍♀️ 2010s


Mario Klingemann explored neural networks for portraiture and generative aesthetics. Memories of Passersby I (2018) generates new faces endlessly, in real time.


🙋‍♀️ 2010s


Sougwen Chung trained AI on her own drawing gestures and co-painted with robotic arms. The art is the relationship, not just the output.


🙋‍♀️ 2010s


Refik Anadol uses large-scale datasets and machine learning to create immersive installs in museums, architecture, public space. AI as atmosphere.


🙋‍♀️ 2020s


Niceaunties uses generative AI to build narrative worlds that challenge age, gender and cultural stereotypes or culturally literate, socially pointed, AI-native storytelling.


TL:DR


Is the debate about whether AI can make art? Or about who we’re comfortable letting change in. History does suggest resistance is loud at first and eventually forgotten. To the creators using these tools: How much intent and iteration goes into your work that the average 'it’s just a prompt' critic never sees?


IMAGE CREDIT: Niceaunties: preserving and reimagining the Auntie Archetype through AI, surrealism and social commentary



 
 

pS

AI can generate content in seconds. It’s brilliant at patterns, speed and scale. I love the tech, but I know its limits.

Generative AI can replicate a writing style. It cannot replicate a life. It can’t synthesise the gut-check moment that saved your business. It doesn’t know what it takes.  It can't feel the room - AJ, Founder, Jones & Sons.

BE PASSIONATE

WE ANSWER

We Thought You'd

Never Ask

AWARDS WE HAVE WON

ZERO

We believe in the power of love, compassion and kindness to bring us all together. We celebrate the incredible diversity of cultures, traditions and stories that make our world so meaningful. Let’s walk alongside each other with respect  and a shared commitment to creating a future filled with  understanding.

WE SOCIALISE

Tasmanian-Proud-Partner--Pos-PRIMARY.png

©2024 by JONES & SONS GROUP ABN 53 744 842 416

bottom of page